The Black Money and Imposition of Tax Act’s Legal Framework and Key Provisions

6 Min Read

The Black Money Act was introduced by the Indian government to deal with hidden foreign income and assets. In simple words it targets money and property kept outside India without informing tax authorities. The law is officially called the Black Money Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets and Imposition of Tax Act 2015. Its main aim is to stop tax evasion and make financial dealings more transparent

 

This law is much stricter than the Income Tax Act. It does not allow exemptions or relief in most cases. Heavy penalties can be imposed and in serious situations jail punishment is also possible. The Act mainly applies to people who are residents of India. However NRIs may also be covered if they are treated as residents under Indian tax rules

Taxation of Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets under the Income Tax Act and the Black Money Act 2015

The Income Tax Act requires residents to disclose their foreign income and assets every year. When such income or assets are hidden or not reported, the Black Money Act comes into play.

The foreign income and assets which are not disclosed are taxed at the flat rate of 30 under this Act. There can be no deductions, exemption or adjustments. When an income or asset has been taxed under the Black Money Act, it could not be reassessed by the Income Tax Act.

Key Provisions NRIs Must Know to Stay Compliant

Many NRIs assume the Black Money Act does not apply to them. This belief can be risky. If an NRI becomes a resident under Indian tax laws, foreign assets must be disclosed.

Important points NRIs should remember:

  • Foreign bank accounts must be reported, even if they are inactive

  • Overseas properties need to be disclosed

  • Foreign shares, mutual funds, and investments are covered

  • Assets bought using foreign income are also taxable

Even if the income was earned years ago, non-disclosure can still attract penalties. The Act does not accept ignorance as an excuse.

The Imposition of Penalty under Black Money Act

One of the strongest features of the Black Money Act is its penalty system. Penalties are strict and, in most cases, mandatory.

Section 10 of Black Money Act

Section 10 deals with penalties for undisclosed foreign income and assets. If such an asset is detected, the taxpayer must pay a penalty equal to three times the tax amount. Since tax is charged at 30%, the penalty can go up to 90% of the asset’s value.

This applies even if the asset has not earned any income.

Section 59 of Black Money Act

Section 59 allows tax authorities to issue notices when undisclosed foreign income or assets are suspected. The taxpayer must respond with complete and accurate information.

Failure to reply, or giving false details, can lead to prosecution. This section strengthens investigation and enforcement under the Black Money Act.

Section 43 of Black Money Act

Section 43 concerns cases in the context of deliberate evasion of taxes. In case of conviction, an individual is liable to strict jail time of between three to ten years imprisonment, and fines.

This provision makes the Black Money Act far more severe than ordinary tax laws.

Renowned Black Money Act Case Laws, Court Judgements for Imposition of Penalty

Courts play a key role in ensuring penalties under the Black Money Act are applied fairly.

Hindustan Steel Ltd. v. State of Orissa

The Supreme Court in this landmark case determined that penalties are not to be administered at automatic will. The court also decided that a penalty must entail a deliberate malfeasance, as opposed to a technical error.

This principle is often relied upon while examining penalties under the Black Money Act.

Kamal Envirotech (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of GST

The court observed that penalties must be reasonable and based on facts. Mechanical or unjustified penalties were discouraged.

This judgement supports taxpayers facing excessive penalties without proper reasoning.

Shri Madhav Arvind Gogte S/O Arvind vs The Income Tax Department

This case highlighted the importance of evidence before imposing severe penalties. The court stressed that facts and proper procedure matter, even under strict laws like the Black Money Act.

Conclusion

Pharmacy is a field that is primarily regulated by the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI). Its major role is to establish and impose minimum standards of education on any pharmacy leading to registration as a pharmacist. 

It establishes rules of education, licensing of institutions and courses, inspection of facilities, qualification and propagation of similar norms in the entire Indian education to qualify practice.

Share This Article
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *